Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +626%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy