Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 430 OEM and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430 OEM
0.269 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +4360%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
22
96
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

49W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
AD107
GF108-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy