Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900 +111%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
480
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

120W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Turks
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy