Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270 +210%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
RV770
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy