Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
19328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +21016%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
19456
64
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
153 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy