Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM GeForce 315M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +6202%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce 315M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.78 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
14W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT218
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N11M-GE
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy