NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1266MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
+137%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Ellesmere
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
