Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +8803%
2.849 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Feb 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
40
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.84 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
RV610
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy