Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4870 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +137%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4870
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
800
56
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
RV770
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy