Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FireGL V7600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FireGL V7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 127W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +641%
2.849 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
127W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
R600
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
R600 GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy