Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +9724%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Apr 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
G86
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G86-213-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy