Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 4700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 4700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +641%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4700
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV730
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 CE
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy