Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1665MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +323%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
70
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
4480
56
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GA100
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy