Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +148%
2.984 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
800
56
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV770
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy