NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages

Released 2 years late

Boost Clock1665MHz

Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)

1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650

2.984 TFLOPS

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +91%

5.728 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650

VS

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Graphics Card

Apr 2019

Release Date

Apr 2017

GeForce 16

Generation

Radeon Pro GCN

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz

Base Clock

-

1665 MHz

Boost Clock

-

2001 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR5

128bit

Memory Bus

256bit

128.1GB/s

Bandwidth

224.0GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

-

Compute Units

36

896

Shading Units

2304

56

TMUs

144

32

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

39.78 GPixel/s

93.24 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

179.0 GTexel/s

5.967 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

5.728 TFLOPS

2.984 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

5.728 TFLOPS

93.24 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

358.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117

GPU Name

Ellesmere

TU117-300-A1

GPU Variant

Ellesmere Gemini GL

Turing

Architecture

GCN 4.0

TSMC

Foundry

GlobalFoundries

12 nm

Process Size

14 nm

4.7 billion

Transistors

5.7 billion

200 mm²

Die Size

232 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

250W

250 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA TITAN V

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance