Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 171W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
-
72
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV380
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy