Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +613%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
192
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Orthrus
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy