Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +2220%
11.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
320bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
TU102
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy