Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2 +591%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
265W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Tonga
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy