Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro VII

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro VII

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro VII to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro VII 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro VII +2637%
13.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
408.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.11 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.06 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.528 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Vega 20
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS (215-0914026)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy