Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +5503%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
160bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
AD104
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy