Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800 +9%
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
400
64
TMUs
20
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Redwood
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy