CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8100
+2153%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
VS
Radeon Pro WX 8100
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
56
192
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
28
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
Vega 10
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
2
AMD FirePro W5000 DVI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
4
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs ATI Radeon X1050
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy