Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro W9000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +737%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
274W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy