Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 425W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
14400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 D +15317%
73.54 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2280 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
1008GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
114
192
Shading Units
14592
64
TMUs
456
28
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
456
-
RT Cores
114
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1149 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
73.54 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.54 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1149 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
425W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
AD102
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
AD102-250-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy