Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 +960%
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GT218
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy