Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FireStream 9370

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370 +453%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1600
64
TMUs
80
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Cypress
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy