Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
19264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +17032%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
448bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
19456
64
TMUs
1216
28
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
153 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy