Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1100%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Ellesmere
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy