Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +2853%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
475W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Vega 20
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy