Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +2088%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
205W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 10
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy