Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM +238%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Tobago
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy