Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +1392%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2018
GeForce 200
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Polaris 30
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy