Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +13424%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
320bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
84
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
5376
64
TMUs
336
28
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 31
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy