Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs Intel Arc Pro A50

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +673%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
96bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy