Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 3850

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 3850

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 53.12GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 3850 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition +45%
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
830 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
53.12GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.69 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
427.5 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
RV670
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy