Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Boost +432%
3.315 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.315 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
828.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO2 (215-0821282)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy