Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +53%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy