Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY +1052%
7.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Fiji
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy