Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2 +365%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
265W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tonga
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy