Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +162%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Cayman
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy