Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 289W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R400 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
490 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
31.36GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
12
28
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
49W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x Molex

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
R420
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
R420 GTO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
281 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy