Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (289W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
18192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada +15487%
92.9 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
1152GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
144
240
Shading Units
18432
80
TMUs
576
28
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
800W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
AD102
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy