Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 645 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 645 OEM +77%
0.949 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
576
Shading Units
216
48
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.888 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
39.55 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
949.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
39.55 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GT200
GK106-200-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy