Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro RG220

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +2185%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
M93
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy