CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro RG220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro RG220
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
AMD FirePro RG220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+2185%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
VS
FirePro RG220
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
M93
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
4
AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
5
NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon R9 280
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy