Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro S9010

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro S9010

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 3GB VRAM FirePro S9010 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
AMD FirePro S9010 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro S9010 +56%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Tahiti
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy