Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FirePro V3750

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +419%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
48W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV730
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy