Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +76%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Tahiti
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy