Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +305%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
768
Shading Units
144
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
106W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GF106
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy