Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI FirePro V3700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1188MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 +2751%
1.825 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV620
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy